On Vision
A sentence on a wall is not a vision. A real vision is a way of seeing — one that reaches your calendar, your money, your body, and your relationships. Boaz's test: look at your last 48 hours and ask whether your actions are actually building the future you claim to want.
What this edition is about
A vision statement framed in a lobby is a decoration. Boaz's definition is harder: a vision is a way of seeing that shows up in how you spend, schedule, train and speak to the people closest to you.
That gives it a test anyone can run without a facilitator. Look at the last 48 hours — the calendar, the transactions, the conversations — and ask whether an outsider reading only that evidence would arrive at the future you say you're building.
When the answer is no, the problem is rarely the vision. It's that nothing downstream of it was ever changed.
- A vision is a way of seeing, not a sentence on a wall.
- A real vision reaches the calendar, the money, the body and the relationships.
- The 48-hour test: would your recent actions imply the future you claim?
- When actions don't match, the fix is downstream, not in better wording.
Leaders who have a stated vision and a calendar that disagrees with it.
This page is a summary. The full edition — with the stories and the detail — lives on Substack.
Read “On Vision”On this edition
Whether it changed anything. A real vision alters what goes on the calendar, where the money goes, how you train, and what you say yes and no to. If the statement exists and nothing downstream of it moved, you don't have a vision — you have a sentence you like.
Take the last two days — your calendar, your spending, your conversations — and hand that evidence to a stranger. Ask what future they'd conclude you were building. If it isn't the one you'd name out loud, that gap is the actual work, and no amount of rewording closes it.